The study surveyed the international protection of human rights since the problem of the research signified the debatable relationship between the organized laws of human rights, and the debatable relationship between the universality of human rights and their privacy as well as the exposure of human rights in Somalia and Darfur for many of the violations. One of the main objectives of the study: the clarification the relationship between the international laws which are relevant to the protection of the human rights, clarification the similarities and differences and the commonalities and complementarities between them, the clarification of the concept of human rights between the cultural universality and privacy. Besides, the clarification of the Security Council viewpoint on the human crisis in Somalia and Sudan (Darfur), as well as the knowledge of the success or failure of the human intervention. The approach used in the research are: the historical approach where there will be a discussion of some of the events and developments that are related to the title of the study in preparation to explain the subject of the study. The comparative approach for a comparison between the human international law and the international human rights law as they are considered responsible for human rights protection. Moreover, the applied approach has also been adopted in the study of the international human intervention in Somalia, Sudan (Darfur). The most important results that have been reached at: it is not problematic in the relationship between the organized laws of human rights; both of them are the complement of each other and both the international human rights law, human international law and the international protection of human rights in peace and war.